LMK Sticking image

Modern automotive displays may be sensitive to static content, which remains as an undesired effect of either temporary vanishing or being a static ghost image within the refreshed content. Therefore, there is a development of measurement procedures to quantize the degree of image sticking [1- 6]. Different aspects of these methods as the grey level dependencies or the importance of a temp-oral alignment were considered in [7]. But the mathematically necessary separation of unavoidable initial non-uniformities and the actual image sticking was excluded in that research.
This contribution concentrates on the performance of two selected image sticking evaluation methods [5, 6] from the automotive community and [1] for reference. After briefly introducing the three methods, this contribution focusses on their capability of separating initial non-uniformities from the actual sticking image effect of the target display. Therefore, a mathematical analysis, which is based on a simple but physically motivated sticking image model, is performed. Based on that, an additional non-uniformity correction is proposed. This additional correction has a positive influence on the precision but a negative influence on the measurement time of the fastest measurement method [6]. Thus, we propose a workflow, that decides based on the properties of the DUT whether the correction is necessary or not. All conclusions are supported by simulations and validated using measurement results of a randomly chosen non-uniform automotive LC display.
The aim of this paper is on the one hand to quantize the mathematical influence of the methods and on the other hands to suggest a workflow, which utilizes an existing method and optimizes its application with respect to precision and overall measurement time.

Image Sticking is an undesired display property, which requires time-consuming and expensive testing. This study summarizes some proposed Image Sticking evaluation methods and identifies relevant differences. It derives aspects, which should be considered prior to a time-consuming and potentially irreversible Sticking Image measurement. Further, parameter analysis associated with the Imaging Luminance Measurement Device is briefly outlined.